supreme court

Supreme Court Ruling a Victory for Individual Rights

 

In a time when all of our personal information is seemingly public, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of personal privacy. On Wednesday June 25, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled police must have a warrant in order to search the information and data on a mobile device.

The unanimous ruling stated that the information stored on mobile phones is constitutionally protected from police search without a warrant. Attorney John A. Birdsall is in support of the ruling saying, “The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision requiring a warrant to search a cell phone is a landmark ruling that is victory for all those interested in protecting citizen privacy from government overreach.”

This ruling now sets a positive precedent for personal privacy and individual rights. This ruling also shows that the law is now adapting to changes in technology. Most of the rules and regulations when it comes to digital communication are unclear and this is the first step in figuring out digital communications law. Attorney Birdsall said, “It seems to me that every American should applaud this decision as a victory for individual rights.”

For more information on the landmark ruling click here.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Attorney John A. Birdsall Admitted to the Bar of the United States Supreme Court

Image

On Nov. 4, 2013, Attorney John A. Birdsall traveled to Washington D.C. to be admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court. Admittance to the bar of the United States Supreme Court is a great honor for any lawyer. John is particularly proud of this accomplishment. While it is rare for a case to reach the United States Supreme Court, this honor is a validation of John’s experience and dedication which has made him one of Wisconsin’s best criminal defense lawyers. In order to receive this honor, a current member of the Supreme Court Bar must file a motion of nomination and then that motion must be granted by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.